Per i marker disabilità e salute materno infantile sono considerati progetti con marker principale quelli che hanno destinato almeno il 75% delle risorse al marker e significativi quelli che hanno destinato meno del 75% ma almeno il 25% delle risorse.
La scheda sull’aiuto in numeri in basso riporta per ciascun anno la distribuzione dei progetti che hanno marker principale o significativo.
Aid in numbers
AICS development projects
Total resources committed
Total resources used
What is it spent for?
The purpose/sector of destination of a bilateral contribution should be selected by answering the question “which specific area of the recipient’s economic or social structure is the transfer intended to foster”. The sector classification does not refer to the type of goods or services provided by the donor. Sector specific education or research activities (e.g. agricultural education) or construction of infrastructure (e.g. agricultural storage) should be reported under the sector to which they are directed, not under education, construction, etc. read more close
|Agriculture, forestry, fishing & food assistance||26,575,533|
|Water Supply & Sanitation||7,407,727|
|General Environment Protection||6,818,774|
|Industry, Mining, Construction||6,763,041|
|Infrastructure, services, transport & communications||3,529,595|
|Banking, financial services, trade policies & commodity assitance||3,309,575|
|Health, reproductive health & population policies||2,940,154|
By means of?
The typology identifies the modalities that are used in aid delivery. It classifies transfers from the donor to the first recipient of funds (e.g. the recipient country, a multilateral organisation, or a basket fund). It does not track the end uses of the funds, which is addressed in the sector classification and to some extent through the policy objective markers. read more close
|Core contributions and pooled programmes and funds||10,918,991|
|Administrative costs not included elsewhere||1,724,500|
|Experts and other technical assistance||1,157,022|